”  Specifically, the EIR failed to adequately support its less-than-significant (LTS) impact conclusion concerning such impacts, in light of a substantial project-caused degradation in level of service (LOS) at affected intersections and streets that was nonetheless compliant with the General Plan’s policy that LOS F was acceptable for the area. [read post]

“Common Sense” Exemption – Under the Final Text, the “general rule” that an activity is exempt from CEQA if there is no possibility that activity may have a significant effect on the environment is now referred to as the “common sense” exemption to match the language used by the California Supreme Court.[12] <Judicial Remedies – Relying on several CEQA cases,[13] the Final Text emphasizes that courts have the equitable discretion to void… [read post]

úff, þvílíkt vesen og brölt á mér hehe. [read post]